Why I started having doubts about a simple file permisison based universe, and what could be done to improve it.
So, originally I was in favor of a simple file-permission based model for protecting us from each other. I.e. there would be various flags (see/touch/telepath/whatnot) and each of us could set and clear them for individuals and groups.
The sentence that made me rethink this was me wanting to restrict all members of the US government from communicating with me. It was undoubtedly a emotional overreaction to yet another police shooting, combined with making the mistake of googling ‘is the US a police state’.
Now, I think this might be one of those rare examples where adding some complexity would help. The first thing I’d add is a timer with a maximum value – i.e. I can block the US government for 5 minutes, or a year, or five years, but not indefinitely. A second radio button would specify whether at the end of the timer I should be asked if I want to clear the bit, or if it should just clear. More invasive bits should be on a default-deny rather than default-allow – i.e. I’d like to have to set telepathy on for you before you can read my mind.
I do however always worry – any time a design requires more complexity, I suspect it’s not the right design. I don’t know what the right answer is, though. But while I think a file permission universe would be a interesting place to visit, I am not yet convinced I’d want to be locked in it for eternity.
One of the questions I’m asking is what sort of universe could you enjoy forever? What *possible* option wouldn’t end up as torture?
January 29th, 2016 at 6:56 pm
One of the issues, I think, is that different people would want very different sorts of universes. I love the file-based permissions idea, myself. I really like that sort of thing in online communication, and I don’t believe I should be forced to have negative interactions I don’t want. Or any interactions I don’t want, really.